What is Kesha's sexuality

Sexual violence is rarely about the question "Who was it?", But mostly about the question: "Who believes whom?" Evidence is almost always missing, there are hardly any witnesses, mostly testimony stands against testimony. Courts and the public have to choose who to believe.

That was the case with the allegations against Bill Cosby, where the alleged victims were long accused of wanting to distinguish themselves at the expense of the popular actor. It is only since the number of women has risen to more than 50 that most observers think differently. That was the case in Stoya against James Deen, in which the alleged victim first had to defend herself against the prejudice that as a porn actress she could not be sexually coerced, that was part of the job. And also in the case of Kesha against Dr. Luke did so at first (the history of the argument can be found on Buzzfeed).

The singer says she was sexually harassed and psychologically terrorized by her producer Lukasz Gottwald for ten years. Once he is said to have made her unconscious with knockout drops and raped her, in another case he is said to have sexually harassed her on the plane while using drugs. In addition, the producer has repeatedly threatened to destroy Kesha's career, family and all of her private life if the matter comes to light.

Gottwald, in the music business as Dr. Luke known, denies all allegations, accuses the artist of damaging her reputation and claims that she threatened him years ago with going public with false accusations if her career did not go to her satisfaction. Kesha is dissatisfied and wants to get out of the contract with the help of the rape rumors, according to which she has to record four more albums under Gottwald's Kemosabe label (currently under the umbrella of Sony Music).

Several lawsuits are running in parallel

Several lawsuits are currently underway to clear up all of this. On the one hand, there is the question of whether the pop singer can break away from her label in the light of the allegations. In this matter, Kesha suffered a temporary defeat last Saturday. The judge wants to wait for the outcome of the other trial, which deals with allegations of sexual and psychological violence. The verdict is still pending here. Nor has a court decided on Gottwald's counterclaim for breach of contract and defamation.

In the meantime, those involved are dealing with their conflict in public. The musician used Facebook a few days ago to thank her fans. "I can't believe that so many people around the world took the time to give me love and support. I am forever grateful to other entertainers who have deliberately put their careers at risk by supporting me," she wrote .

Gottwald responded on Twitter and rejected everything. "I never raped Kesha and I never had sex with her. We were friends for years and she was like a little sister to me," he wrote. He added that he had children, sisters, and a feminist mother who raised him right - presumably an attempt to say, someone like me can't be a rapist.

With that, Dr. Luke to the terrain that often plays the biggest role in the sexual violence debate: credibility. Here, however, large parts of the public and show business currently see Kesha in front. Several million dollar pop stars have announced their solidarity with the singer, including Lady Gaga, Adele and Lorde. Taylor Swift even transferred $ 250,000. On Twitter (#freekesha) and Facebook, hundreds of thousands assured with a click of the mouse that they believed the 28-year-old that online petitions are already running.

Solidarity is now allowed

Actress Lena Dunham wrote in her newsletter Lenny: "The public outcry over Kesha's case is encouraging, the shock and indignation from fans and artists. because they had to be afraid of losing everything themselves. Instead, they sat in silence in front of the television, hoping not to be the next one themselves. Those days are over. "

Fortunately, neither Lena Dunham nor Twitter are responsible for delivering court rulings, and the fact that Kesha is currently enjoying public support is nice for her - but not proof that the abuse took place as she describes it. But her case shows that a woman who talks about the sexual violence she has suffered does not have to confront only disbelief and incomprehension, but that part of the public is now allowed to say: I believe you.

One of the most important principles of the judiciary is that courts "rule for the accused in cases of doubt". Conversely, this must also mean "in case of doubt for the accused". If a court acquits the alleged perpetrator for lack of evidence, it does not automatically mean that the alleged victim is guilty of defamation.

Most of the time, it just means that no one except those involved will ever know what exactly happened. Or it didn't happen either.