Why is trans often grouped with sexuality

Intersexuality and trans identity in diversity management

Handbook Diversity Competence: Subject Areas pp 1-18 | Cite as

  • Thomas Köllen
Living reference work entry
First Online:
Part of the Springer Reference Psychology book series (SRP)

Summary

Both in the scientific diversity discourse and in diversity management practice, intersexuality and trans identity (or transsexuality or transgender) have so far only been marginal issues. This article outlines the different sociological, medical and business fields of discourse for both categories and derives points of contact for organizational diversity management. It is shown that both phenomena represent different aspects of the diversity dimension “gender”. Their usual assignment to a collective category together with the diversity dimension “sexual orientation” can be seen as a major reason why they are mostly not taken into account in diversity programs at the level of measures. Against this background, this article develops a modified approach to the dimension-specific approach in diversity management and shows the need to consider the dimensions “gender”, “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” as a coherent organizational field of action. For diversity management practice, this entails a fundamental rethinking of one's own target systems and design of measures.

keywords

Intersex Intersex Transsexuality Transgender Trans * LGBTI
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

literature

  1. Behrend, H. (1994). Mothers do not make babies: On women and gender studies in ethnology. Journal of Ethnology, 119(2), 175-183. Google Scholar
  2. Bendl, R., Fleischmann, A., & Walenta, C. (2008). Diversity management discourse meets queer theory. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 382-394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, H. (1967). Transvestism and transsexualism. JAMA - The Journal of the American Medical Association, 199(2), 136-136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1991). The discomfort of the sexes (Translated from Menke, K.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1997). Body of weight (Translated from Wördemann, K.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Calvi, E.M. (2012). A crossing of gender boundaries ?: Intersexuality in Western society. Baden-Baden: Deutsche Wissenschafts-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. de Silva, A. (2008). "Gender and" sexual policy assumptions in contemporary medical recommendations for the treatment of intersexuality. In E. Tuider (ed.), Cross connections (Pp. 51-67). Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Döring, N. (2013). For the operationalization of gender in the questionnaire: Problems and possible solutions from the point of view of measurement, survey, gender and queer theory. Gender, 2, 94-113. Google Scholar
  9. Drescher, J., Cohen-Kettenis, P., & Winter, S. (2012). Minding the body: Situating gender identity diagnoses in the ICD-11. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(6), 568-577. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliot, P. (2009). Engaging trans debates on gender variance: A feminist analysis. Sexualities, 12(1), 5-32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliot, P. (2012). Debates in transgender, queer, and feminist theory: Contested sites. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Engel, A. (2002). Against unambiguity: sexuality and gender in the focus of queer politics of representation. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Errington, S. (1990). Recasting sex, gender, and power: A theoretical and regional overview. In J. M. Atkinson & S. Errington (Eds.), Power and difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia (Pp. 1-58). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Franzen, J., & Sauer, A. (2010). Discrimination against trans * people, especially in working life. Berlin: Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency.Google Scholar
  15. Gatens, M. (1983). A critique of the sex / gender distinction. In J. Allen & P. ​​Patton (Eds.), Beyond Marxism? Interventions after Marx (Pp. 143-160). Leichhardt: Intervention Publication.Google Scholar
  16. Gildemeister, R. (2005). Carol Hagemann-White: Socialization: Female - Male? In M. Löw & B. Mathes (eds.), Key works in gender research (Pp. 194-213). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gildemeister, R., & Wetterer, A. (1992). How genders are made: The social construction of bisexuality and its reification in women's studies. In G.-A. Knapp & A. Wetterer (eds.), Traditions break. Developments in Feminist Theory (Pp. 201-254). Freiburg: Kore Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Goldschmidt, R. (1917). Intersexuality and the endocrine aspect of sex. Endocrinology, 1(4), 433–456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldschmidt, R. (1931). Intersexuality and human hermaphroditism. DMW-German Medical Weekly, 57(30), 1288-1292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Groneberg, M. (2008). Myths and Knowledge of Gender and Intersexuality: An Analysis of Relevant Terms, Concepts, and Discourses. In M. Groneberg & K. Zehnder (eds.), "Intersex": gender reassignment for the good of the child? Experience and Analysis (Pp. 83-144). Freiburg: Academic Press Friborg / Paulusverlag Freiburg Switzerland.Google Scholar
  21. Hagemann-White, C. (1984). Socialization: female - male? Everyday life and biography of girls. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hanappi-Egger, E. (2015). Gender scripts as access codes to management positions. In A. M. Broadbridge & S. L. Fielden (Eds.), Handbook of gendered careers in management: getting in, getting on, getting out (Pp. 61-73). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Herdt, G. H. (Ed.). (2003). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history (3rd ed.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  25. Lord, R. (2005). Cutting Patterns of Gender: Transvestism and Transsexuality in Early Sexology. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Hirschfeld, M. (1910). The transvestites - an investigation into the erotic disguise instinct: with extensive casuistic and historical material. Berlin: Alfred Pulvermacher & Co.Google Scholar
  27. Hirschfeld, M. (1923). The intersex constitution. Yearbook for sexual intermediate stages with special consideration of homosexuality, 23, 3-27. Google Scholar
  28. Hughes, I.A., Houk, C., Ahmed, S.F., & Lee, P.A. (2006). Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Journal of pediatric urology, 2(3), 148-162. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Klöppel, U. (2010). XX0XY unsolved. Hermaphroditism, Sex and Gender in German Medicine. A historical study of intersexuality. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landweer, H., & Rumpf, M. (1993). Criticism of the "Gender" category. Weinheim: Deutsche Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Lewandowski, S., & Koppetsch, C. (Eds.) (2015). Sexual Diversity and the Disorder of the Sexes: Contributions to the Sociology of Sexuality. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  32. Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. (1994). Intersexuality and the diagnosis of gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(1), 21–40. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, H.L. (1994). A passion for difference: Essays in anthropology and gender. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Morland, I. (2014). Intersex. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1-2), 111-115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, gender and society. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  36. Olyslager, F., & Conway, L. (2007). On the calculation of the prevalence of transsexualism. Paper presented at the World Professional Association for Transgender Health 20th International Symposium, Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Papoulias, C. (2006). Transgender. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 231-233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pfäfflin, F. (2008). Transsexual Desire. In A. Springer, K. Münch & D. Munz (Eds.), Sexualities (Pp. 311-330). Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Rauchfleisch, U. (2014). Transsexuality – transidentity: assessment, support, therapy. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  40. Reiche, R. (1984). Sexuality, identity, transsexuality. Contributions to sex research, 59, 51-64. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Reis, E. (2007). Divergence or disorder? The politics of naming intersex. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50(4), 535-543. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Remus, J. (2015). Inter * realities. In F. Schmidt, A.-C. Schondelmayer & U. B. Schröder (Eds.), Self-determination and recognition of sexual and gender diversity (Pp. 63-74). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar
  43. Richter-Appelt, H. (2004). Intersex and medicine. Journal of Sex Research, 17(3), 239-257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 174-178. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schochow, M. (2009). The order of the hermaphrodite sexes: a genealogy of the gender concept. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sigusch, V. (1991). The transsexuals and our nosomorphic view: To de-totalize transsexualism. Journal of Sex Research, 4(3), 225-256. Google Scholar
  47. Snyder, R.C. (2008). What is third-wave feminism? A new directions essay. Signs, 34(1), 175-196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stern, C. (2010). Intersex: history, medicine and psychosocial aspects. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, E. (2010). Cisgender privilege: On the privileges of performing normative gender. In K. Bornstein & S. B. Bergman (Eds.), Gender outlaws: The next generation (Pp. 268-272). Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  50. Voss, H.-J. (2012). Intersex-intersex: an intervention. Münster: Unrast Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. Wetterer, A. (2004). Construction of gender: modes of reproduction of bisexuality. In R. Becker & B. Kortendiek (eds.), Handbook for Women and Gender Studies (Vol. 35, pp. 122-131). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yanagisako, S.J., & Collier, J.F. (1987). Toward a unified analysis of gender and kinship. In J. F. Collier & S. J. Yanagisako (eds.), Gender and kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis (Pp. 14-50). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Zajko, V. (2009). 'Listening With' Ovid: Intersexuality, Queer theory, and the myth of Hermaphroditus and Salmacis. Helios, 36(2), 175-202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zehnder, K. (2010). Calling hermaphrodites by name - intersexuality between pathology, self-determination and physical experience. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Department of Management, Institute for Gender and Diversity in Organizations, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria